| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
- Uncategorized (133)
- 10/03/2010: Budget growth, budget cuts and School Business Managers
- 09/03/2010: Easter discounts on direct mail and email work
- 04/03/2010: Last minute spending
- 03/03/2010: Don't mention the name of the secretary of state
- 28/02/2010: The strangest schools story of the week
- 22/02/2010: "How to increase your sales to schools by 10%"
- 19/02/2010: Selling to schools after half term to Easter
- 17/02/2010: You are probably not reading this
- 15/02/2010: The forgotten benefits of solo mailing
- 12/02/2010: Why blogs can be so amazingly effective when selling to schools
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
What the audit commission says about school finance
Every now and then the Audit Commission takes a look at school finances. A few years ago it attacked the government for its insanely complex method of funding schools through so many different funds. This time it has gone down a different route arguing
a) Some money is being horded rather than spent
b) Schools are wasting money by not shopping around enough.
Michael O’Higgins, chairman of the Audit Commission, said: “Schools are not wasting money deliberately, but I don’t think the focus has been enough on economy and efficiency. The focus has been the drive to raise standards – that’s not incompatible with economy and efficiency, but if you take your eye off the ball you lose that focus.”
The report concludes that despite record increases in funding since 1997, when Labour came to power, headteachers have not put all the money to good use. They could save £415m if they negotiated better contracts for the running of their schools and are also sitting on £530m in “excessive” reserves. There has been a collective failure through the system – from schools right up to government level – to emphasise efficiency, the report will say. “If no one is asking ‘could you do this more efficiently, more cheaply?’, you’re not going to be focused on it,” O’Higgins said.
“Individual schools have taken their eye off the ball. If you’ve had resources pumped in, you might not be aware of the last 1% you could be saving. Given the tight financial forecasts, they are going to have to [be aware].”
The report asks the government to consult over methods to redistribute school budgets if it isn’t being spent. Some councils already claw back money.
It also suggests that Ofsted should scrutinise schools’ finances more closely during inspections. The reverse could hardly be possible since Ofsted inspectors generally do little in terms of admin and funds. Indeed during several of the most famous cases of school fraud Ofsted inspected the school in question and found its accounts and finances to be robust. When I challenged Ofsted on this four years ago, I got back a short email saying “we are inspectors, not auditors”.
Vernon Coaker, the schools minister, said the government expected “local authorities to take action where necessary to ensure … proper value for money.”
Tony
This item first appeared on Admin News - the free weekly email news service for school administrators. If you would like to get the news on a regular basis, just send an email to Ed.Admin@schools.co.uk and write the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. Alternatively visit www.schools.co.uk/aboutEMN.html
Hamilton House Mailings plc reg number 2444392 VAT 354907535GB. Phone 01536 399 000.